Close Menu
Daktilo 1984Daktilo 1984
    • Hakkımızda
    • İletişim
    • E-Bültene Abone Ol
    • Destek Ol
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Telegram
    X (Twitter) Facebook YouTube Instagram WhatsApp
    Daktilo 1984Daktilo 1984
    Destek Ol Abone Ol
    • İZLE
      • Çavuşesku’nun Termometresi
      • 2’li Görüş
      • İki Savaş Bir Yazar
      • Cumhuriyet’in Edebiyatı
      • Varsayılan Ekonomi
      • Yakın Tarih
      • Tümünü Gör
    • OKU
      • Yazılar
      • Röportajlar
      • Çeviriler
      • D84 INTELLIGENCE
      • Asterisk2050
      • Yazarlar
      • Kitap Yorum
    • D84 FYI
      • Hariçten Gazel
      • ABD Gündemi
      • Avrupa Gündemi
    • daktilo2
    • Project Syndıcate
    Daktilo 1984Daktilo 1984
    Anasayfa » Turkey’s Diminishing Freedoms on the Net
    D84 INTELLIGENCE

    Turkey’s Diminishing Freedoms on the Net

    By Begüm Burak24 Mayıs 20234 Mins Read
    Share
    Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email WhatsApp

    A strong civil society, rule of law, and individual liberties form the bedrock on which democratic societies grow. In today’s world, freedom on the net has emerged as an important liberty which steadily contributes to the well-being of democratic societies.

    Despite the increasing awareness over the importance of online freedoms, there has been a growing pressure on the net. According to Freedom House’s Freedom on the Net 2022 Report in at least 53 countries, internet users faced legal repercussions for expressing themselves online, often leading to prison terms. Turkey has been among the countries which hold a bad record of Internet freedom.

    Freedom House report reveals that Turkey is not free about online freedoms with a score of 32/100 and states the following:

    “The push toward domestic platforms often followed explicit or implicit attacks on the credibility of international platforms, further undermining trust in the global information space. In Turkey, many state agencies flocked to the WhatsApp alternative BiP in 2021, after the Meta-owned app introduced a problematic privacy policy update. BiP is owned by the mobile operator Turkcell, which the state’s sovereign wealth fund controls.”

    It is known that the enactment of a “disinformation” bill in Turkey could further strengthen the government’s control over the online space. The AKP government with the constitutional changes adopted in 2017 put all the concentrated power in the hands of the president. In such an environment, the passing of the so-called disinformation bill is expected to assist the ruling elites in silencing the opposition and critical media voices. In May 2022, the so–called disinformation bill was enacted. This law has received many criticisms, and it was drafted without consulting stakeholders.

    Freedom House report’s another important finding about Turkey is related to the pro-government troll networks. Freedom House states the pro-government troll networks orchestrated smear campaigns against activists, and journalists. Researches have revealed that AKP has an “army of trolls” numbering around 6.000 people to manipulate online discussions and combat government critics on social media platforms.  The trolls attack opposition media, human rights groups, and government critics.

    The Free Web Turkey Project that was established under the roof of the Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA) has been making detailed researches in the field of internet freedoms since 2020. According to the Free Web Turkey 2021 Annual Report, a total of 11050 URLs, domains or social media contents were blocked between January 1 and December 31, 2021 and examined access blocks were classified under the following different headings such as “adult betting, fraud, financial websites, terrorism” ,“news regarding the government or the Erdoğan family”, “harassment” “Sedat Peker” , “child abuse” and “anti-LGBTI+ discourses”.

    According to Free Web Turkey Report, access blocks to news also affect the journalists causing them to encounter situations such as investigations, and arrests. In April, access to the news about the lawsuit in which Journalist P. Ü. was prosecuted based on the complaints of Berat Albayrak, Serhat Albayrak and Çalık Holding for the news she wrote about “Paradise Papers” was blocked. The news and tweets about the blocked news were again blocked by the Istanbul Anatolian 3rd Criminal Judgeship of Peace and they were decided to be deleted.

    Apart from the court decisions that put restrictions on the access to several online contents, the internet users in Turkey faced several blockages on Twitter after the massive earthquakes of February 6 2023. However, Twitter helped people living in the cities impacted by the earthquake immensely. People started sharing information from the earthquake zones over Twitter.

    Freedom on the Internet is quite a critical issue while discussing threats against human rights in cyberspace. A significant aspect of internet censorship is directly related with freedom of expression and freedom to reach information. Online censorships are vital for freedom of expression and freedom of reaching information. Based on the data concerning online censorship in Turkey, it can be argued that online freedoms have been targeted heavily by the government. According to 2019 Engelli Web Report,  the ranking of Turkey in the Twitter Transparency Reports is strikingly worrying as the total number of removal and withholding requests for accounts and tweets is much higher in Turkey than in Russia and Japan.

    To make a long story short, it can be said that in current years, internet freedom has faced a sharp decline in Turkey. Thousands of online users faced criminal charges. Self-censorship, censorship and blocking of social media content or oppositional media publications have caused the emergence of a less diverse cyberspace in the country which also erodes democracy.

    References:

    Akdeniz Y. O. Güven, Engelli Web 2019 Report, https://ifade.org.tr/reports/EngelliWeb_2019_Eng.pdf

    Freedom House, Freedom on the Net 2022 Report, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2022/countering-authoritarian-overhaul-internet

    Free Web Turkey, 2021 Report, https://www.freewebturkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/freeweb2021-ingilizce-son_compressed.pdf

    Hukuk Siyaset
    Share. Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email WhatsApp
    Previous ArticleDünya Gündemi: G7 Zirvesi’nden Rusya’ya Yeni Yaptırımlar Çıktı
    Next Article Geri döndük: kısa bir yıl özeti | Sinekritik #88

    Diğer İçerikler

    D84 INTELLIGENCE

    Beyond the NATO Summit Communiqué: The Human Front of NATO

    24 Temmuz 2026By Nancy Snow
    Çeviriler PROJECT SYNDICATE

    Dünyanın Soyguncu Baronu Olarak ABD

    23 Temmuz 2026By Daktilo1984
    Podcast

    Dijital Mecralarda Konuşabilmek | Tarık Beyhan, Gürkan Özturan

    22 Temmuz 2026By Tarık Beyhan ve Gürkan Özturan

    Comments are closed.

    İçerik
    • Yazılar
    • Podcast
    • Forum
    • Röportajlar
    • Çeviriler
    • Özetler
    • Bültenler
    • D84 INTELLIGENCE
    Konular
    • Siyaset
    • Ekonomi
    • Dünya
    • Tarih
    • Kültür Sanat
    • Spor
    • Rapor
    • Gezi
    Sosyal Medya
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Youtube
    • LinkedIn
    • Apple Podcast
    • Spotify Podcast
    • Whatsapp Kanalı
    Kurumsal
    • Anasayfa
    • Hakkımızda
    • İletişim
    • Yazarlar
    • D84 Yayınları
    • İçerik Sağlayıcılar
    • Yayın İlkeleri ve Yazım Kuralları
    © 2026 DAKTİLO1984
    • KVKK Politikası
    • Çerez Politikası
    • Aydınlatma Metni
    • Açık Rıza Beyanı

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Çerezler

    Sitemizde mevzuata uygun şekilde çerez kullanılmaktadır.

    Fonksiyonel Her zaman aktif
    Sitenin çalışması için ihtiyaç duyulan çerezlerdir
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    İstatistik
    Daha iyi bir kullanıcı deneyimi sağlamak için kullanılan çerezlerdir The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Pazarlama
    Size daha uygun içeriklerin iletilmesi için kullanılan çerezlerdir
    • Seçenekleri yönet
    • Hizmetleri yönetin
    • {vendor_count} satıcılarını yönetin
    • Bu amaçlar hakkında daha fazla bilgi edinin
    Seçenekler
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}